Analysis

Litecoin security revenue after halvings: what the arithmetic can tell us

A transparent subsidy model for LTC and DOGE, with clear limits on interpreting revenue as network security.

Litecoin security revenue after halvings: what the arithmetic can tell us

Correction · 1 October 2026. Unsourced historical price, hashrate and fee estimates were replaced with labelled scenarios. Miner subsidy revenue is no longer equated with an attack-cost estimate. The original publication date and URL are retained. This is a source-based editorial correction, not an independent security audit.

Subsidy issuance is computable from protocol parameters. Dollar revenue also needs prices and a time window. The cost of attacking the chain needs much more than either: accessible hardware, competing work, operating constraints and the attack being considered.

A target-rate issuance model

Litecoin targets 150-second blocks and halves its subsidy every 840,000 blocks. With a 6.25 LTC subsidy, the target-rate calculation is 86,400 / 150 × 6.25 = 3,600 LTC per day. Actual daily blocks vary. Halvings occur at heights, so calendar dates beyond an observed block are estimates.

Protocol-based issuance calculations, not observed daily totals.
Halving heightLTC / blockTarget-rate LTC / day
2,520,0006.253,600
3,360,0003.1251,800
4,200,0001.5625900
5,040,0000.78125450

Keep a dollar scenario explicit

At an illustrative $60/LTC and $0.10/DOGE, LTC subsidy revenue at the target rate is $216,000 daily. Dogecoin’s 10,000 DOGE subsidy and 60-second target imply 14.4 million DOGE, or $1.44 million daily. Combined model subsidy revenue is $1.656 million, of which LTC contributes about 13.0%.

If only the LTC subsidy halves, the combined model falls to $1.548 million: a 6.52% decline rather than 50%. This holds prices, block rates and participation fixed and excludes all transaction fees and other merged-mined coins. It does not forecast miner behavior.

Measure fees instead of guessing

To report a historical fee contribution, choose a complete set of blocks, sum their actual fees and record missing heights. Do not multiply an unsourced “typical block” by a day. Our network archive exposes observation coverage and distinguishes snapshot averages from transaction-weighted totals.

Revenue is not attack cost

Two networks with the same measured hashrate can have different economic risks. Equally, a reduction in dollar revenue does not specify how many miners exit or how much Scrypt capacity an attacker can acquire. Difficulty adjustment changes expected rewards per unit of work; it does not replenish revenue or make a safety guarantee.

Use the calculator for a machine-level stress case and the halving tracker for block-height progress. For current hardware and a frozen observed market input set, see the seven-configuration mining study.

Sources and checks

Sources checked on 1 October 2026. Historical figures are labelled by their reporting period; illustrative calculations are not observed market results.

Method and data

Content review recorded: 2026-10-01. The review record does not identify a separate independent reviewer. An edited date above records an edit, not a new fact-check.

Next scheduled review: 2026-10-31.

Sources saved with the review:

See the article body for source links and any downloadable materials. Editorial method · Corrections · Report an issue

Jarosław Wasiński
Editor-in-chief · Financial markets and Litecoin education

Editor-in-chief of Litecoin.watch and founder of MyBank.pl. His published work covers foreign exchange, financial education and Litecoin. On Litecoin.watch, his remit includes editorial direction, source transparency and the practical guides and research published by the site.

Background, selected work and editorial responsibility →

Founder of MyBank.plFinancial education and market analysisNamed editorial responsibility