Guide

How to back up your Litecoin records and check that they restore

Our four-record test restored the same 1.2999 LTC through JSON and CSV, but CSV dropped an unused account and both balance checks. Follow a complete-backup and isolated-restore checklist, including merge and encryption limits.

Two unprinted folders with blank tabbed papers and a small unbranded USB storage drive on a wooden desk.

Conceptual editorial illustration of keeping and checking copies of records; no wallet secrets, account data or restoration evidence are shown.

On this page

A backup is useful when it can restore the records you need. A downloaded CSV can reproduce your Litecoin quantity while leaving behind an unused account, saved balance checks or other context you expected to keep. A second import can also skip records instead of replacing the current ledger.

We tested the current Litecoin.watch portfolio modules with a fictional four-record ledger. Complete JSON restored all three accounts and both saved balance checks into an empty portfolio. CSV restored the transactions and the same 1.2999 LTC quantity, but reconstructed only the two used accounts and no saved checks.

This guide turns those results into a practical backup check: save the right file, verify its contents in a separate empty environment, and preserve your original records while you test.

Reviewed 12 October 2026. Tests exercised byte-pinned production module functions in Node.js with Web Crypto and fictional records. No real browser storage, wallet secrets, accounts or transactions were accessed. We did not perform a browser-interface restore, test cloud storage or measure cross-browser compatibility.

Keep record backups separate from wallet recovery

The Litecoin.watch portfolio tracks what you enter: purchases, sales, internal transfers, historical currency rates and balance checks. Its JSON file records that history. It does not contain the signing keys needed to spend Litecoin.

Three files can have different jobs even when all are called a backup
MaterialWhat it preservesWhat restoration establishes
Appropriate wallet recovery materialSigning access and relevant wallet configurationRequires the correct wallet-specific recovery procedure
Portfolio JSONTracker accounts, transactions and saved balance checksA restored record set; no control over coins
Portfolio CSVThe supported exported transaction fieldsRestored rows; some account/check context is absent

Keep both forms of recovery appropriate to your situation. A perfect record backup cannot recover signing keys, and a successful wallet restore does not recreate your acquisition prices, cash fees or private notes. The wallet recovery tests address signing and discovery separately.

Do not put a seed, private key or wallet file into the portfolio's notes or import fields. The record backup is designed to carry financial history and account labels. Those can still be sensitive even though they cannot sign a payment.

Export complete JSON and check the actual saved file

In Transaction history, choose Backup JSON for the complete record set. Use Export CSV when you want inspectable transaction rows or another supported workflow. Keep the actual JSON file somewhere separate from the browser profile that holds the live portfolio.

The page reports when a complete backup download was requested and whether the current records match that requested export. That status does not prove a file reached the intended folder, survived a later deletion or passed a restoration test. Open your downloads, check the filename and file size, and record where the copy is kept.

The browser's stored portfolio can persist after closing a tab. MDN's localStorage documentation explains that storage belongs to the document's origin and persists across sessions; private-session storage has different persistence. A file outside the profile gives you a separate recovery route when site data is cleared or you move to another environment.

Keep the original download unchanged while checking it. If you open a CSV in spreadsheet software, save any edited working copy under a different name. Renaming a CSV to end in .json does not turn it into a complete JSON backup.

What our four-record exercise actually restored

The fixture has three accounts: Exchange records, Offline wallet and Unused account. Two separate fills each buy 0.75 LTC at a fictional $96 price with a $0.60 cash fee. Their dates, amounts, prices, fees and notes are identical, but their transaction identifiers are different.

Next, 0.4 LTC moves to Offline wallet with an extra 0.0001 LTC fee. A final 0.2 LTC sale from Exchange records uses a $120 execution price and $0.25 cash fee. Purchases cost $145.20 in total and the sale returns $23.75. The remaining quantity is 1.5 − 0.0001 − 0.2 = 1.2999 LTC.

Measured export and parse results for the same fictional ledger
FieldOriginalJSON restoreCSV restore
Transaction records444
Account definitions332 used accounts
Saved balance checks220
Combined quantity1.29990000 LTC1.29990000 LTC1.29990000 LTC
Transfer amount and fee0.4 + 0.0001 LTCPreservedPreserved
Saved trade FX and valuationsPresentPreservedPreserved

CSV carries current transaction fields, including account identifiers/names, transfer fees, historical FX, pre-trade valuations and notes. The limitation is specific: an account that no transaction references is not reconstructed, and saved balance checks are not exported. Our CSV was parsed directly from the exporter; spreadsheet editing was not tested.

The fixture's saved Exchange records check declares 0.9 LTC against a calculated 0.8999, leaving a 0.0001 LTC difference. JSON restores that comparison too. CSV produces the correct transaction quantity but has no saved check to show the difference. A matching headline total is therefore insufficient to prove full record fidelity.

Fictional ledger module test: JSON restores three accounts and two saved checks; CSV restores two used accounts and no checks, with the same 1.2999 LTC quantity.
Measured module-function results for four fictional records, tested against the pinned current portfolio source. This is a record-portability test, not a browser-profile migration or a wallet recovery test. Open SVG.

Importing into an existing ledger is a merge

The import screen previews additions and skipped records. Confirming it adds the merged result while keeping existing transactions. It does not replace the entire portfolio with the file's snapshot.

Measured merge outcomes using the complete fictional JSON backup
Starting stateAddedSkippedResult
Empty default portfolio40Full normalized snapshot restored
Same complete ledger04Unchanged; both identical separate fills retained
One original fill already present31All four records present afterward
Same transaction ID with changed quantityNo mergeNo mergeConflict rejected
Existing account name and balance check0 transactions4Existing name/check retained

Repeated complete backups deduplicate the records in this test without collapsing its two distinct identical fills into one. Check the expected record count when working with other exports: deduplication is an import rule, not independent proof that two entries describe the same real event.

We also measured two less obvious limits. When the populated target had an existing account name and saved check, importing the backup retained them. An imported check dated 30 September did not replace the target's existing 29 September check. A transaction differing only in historical FX and pre-trade valuation was also counted as a duplicate; the existing metadata stayed.

This is why importing into a populated ledger is a different exercise from verifying a fresh restore. Review those fields deliberately. If you need to correct an existing record, use the appropriate editing workflow and verify the result instead of assuming a later backup will overwrite it.

Check an encrypted backup before relying on its password

The optional encrypted JSON control protects the downloaded record file with AES-256-GCM. The reviewed module derives its key using PBKDF2-SHA256 with 600,000 iterations and generates a 16-byte salt and 12-byte nonce. The portfolio already stored in the browser remains unencrypted.

We exercised that exact encryption module through Node's Web Crypto implementation. The correct test password decrypted the original JSON text exactly; parsing and merging it into an empty state restored the whole fixture. A wrong password, a changed ciphertext byte and a changed nonce each caused decryption to reject. Two encryptions of the same text produced different salt, nonce and ciphertext values.

MDN's AES-GCM parameters explain the nonce and authentication requirements. Its key-derivation reference describes PBKDF2, and the encryption API documentation identifies browser secure-context requirements. Our tests check these specific module outcomes; they are not a cryptographic audit or browser-compatibility survey.

Use a separate backup-file password, keep it separately from the file and test decryption while you still have the original records. A forgotten password has no recovery mechanism here. Encrypting one download does not protect an already compromised device or transform the file into wallet recovery material.

Verify restoration in a separate empty environment

Preserve the original browser portfolio. Open the tool in a separate browser profile or another environment with no existing portfolio records. Check that it is empty before importing. Clearing the original site's data to simulate a disaster creates an unnecessary chance of losing the very records you are checking.

For ordinary JSON, use Import JSON or CSV. For encrypted JSON, enter the file password in the encrypted-backup section and choose Decrypt and preview a backup. Review the proposed additions before confirming. In our fresh-state fixture, the expected preview is four additions and zero skipped transactions.

Acceptance checks that go beyond seeing an LTC balance
CheckFixture targetWhy check it
Transaction identity and count4 unique IDs; 2 separate fillsCatch omitted or duplicated events
Account definitionsAll 3 names, including Unused accountCatch incomplete account restoration
Saved balance comparisons2 checks; main difference 0.0001 LTCPreserve the evidence of an unresolved mismatch
Account quantities0.8999 main; 0.4 wallet; 0 unusedCatch misplaced transfer legs
Trade and transfer metadataRecorded FX, valuations, notes and fees matchKeep more than the headline quantity

Use targets from your own saved records for a real test. Current market value can change between export and restoration, so compare recorded quantities and historical fields first. A saved statement difference should remain visible until you investigate it; the restore should not invent a transaction to remove it.

Import the same complete backup a second time in the test environment and inspect the preview. Our fixture produced zero additions and four skipped records. Record the date you actually completed the check. If you used a private session for testing, keep the downloaded backup independently of that temporary session.

Repeat the check after changes that matter

Create a new complete backup after adding or correcting meaningful records, renaming accounts, entering historical FX or saving a balance comparison. Keep a previously verified copy while checking the new one, with dates in the filenames so you can identify the intended snapshot.

The page's backup status helps show whether records changed since the last requested complete export. It still requires you to verify the actual file and its restoration. A CSV-only export does not establish that accounts and saved checks were backed up.

A successful restore checks record portability. Verifying that those records match actual wallet or exchange statements is another task, covered in our portfolio reconciliation guide. Once records are reliable, the return-measurement path helps distinguish quantities, recorded costs and investment performance.

Download the fixture, source snapshots and checklists

The release includes the fictional complete JSON backup, its transaction CSV, results and 60 passing assertions and 13 reported cases. Keep these teaching records in a test environment; do not add them to your actual ledger.

For reproduction, download the Node test script, input fixture and pinned source package. The README explains extraction and running in a fresh temporary copy. The calculation checks independently use integer litoshis and scaled integer dollars. Our production version check matched the seven source snapshots and the corresponding assets loaded by the portfolio page.

The plain-text restore record and CSV checklist provide blank fields for your own completed check. No recovery secrets belong in either. Checksums identify this release's files; they do not independently certify record truth.

Research, code and drafting used AI assistance. The measured scope is module behavior with fictional data, including encryption through Node Web Crypto. No real browser-profile migration, cloud recovery, device-security audit or independent external review is claimed.

The artwork record identifies the generated conceptual hero and original explanatory diagram.

Method and data

Downloadable data or code · Download verification test · Beginner selection.

Content review recorded: 2026-10-12. The review record does not identify a separate independent reviewer. An edited date above records an edit, not a new fact-check.

Next scheduled review: 2027-01-10.

Sources saved with the review:

Research records

  • Download verification test · 1.0

    Byte-pinned current production portfolio module functions exercised in Node.js/Web Crypto with fictional records: JSON/CSV round trips, merge limits and encrypted-file outcomes. No real browser-profile restore, cloud recovery, wallet-key recovery or independent external audit.

    All 60 assertions passed. Complete JSON retained three account definitions and two saved checks; CSV retained four transaction records and 1.2999 LTC but omitted the unused account and both checks.

    Method & reproduction · Download data / results · Versioned citation

Report dates identify the evidence cutoff or release. Recalculating an export checks its arithmetic; a model is not an observed outcome.

See the article body for source links and any downloadable materials. Editorial method · Corrections · Report an issue

Jarosław Wasiński
Editor-in-chief · Financial markets and Litecoin education

Editor-in-chief of Litecoin.watch and founder of MyBank.pl. His published work covers foreign exchange, financial education and Litecoin. On Litecoin.watch, his remit includes editorial direction, source transparency and the practical guides and research published by the site.

Background, selected work and editorial responsibility →

Founder of MyBank.plFinancial education and market analysisNamed editorial responsibility